Actually, I already noted that one's case might not be accepted, but that it was enough that one made the effort, baring a legal matter. Since it is hard to get a competent, trustworthy, and unbiased tribunal, my emphasis is on being willing to answer for oneself, not on any judgment rendered, in order to ensure objectivity and show a decent respect for those who might have an interest in the matter.
As for the proof, it would be ludicrous if we refused to rely on general observation, but required "scientific proof" for everything. In fact, if one goes by the rate of college attendance and graduation, or comparative rates of incarceration, women are smarter and morally superior to men. But the general observation that they appear to handle responsibility well, and to be competitive with males, in any number of occupations, suffices to refute the notion that they, as a group, required guardianship, which was my main contention....... |
