Interesting that you compare learning morals to learning language.
Both, in your view, as I take it, are societal constructs.
In the moral sphere you want us to impose our superior moral understanding on those of inferior moral understanding.
Is the same true for language? Is Englsh superior to Latin, or German, or Chinese, or Urdu? Are people linguistically wrong who speak Spanish, or Basque?
With language, I think it's clear that one may be more useful, more widely acceptable, easier to learn, than another, but it is not superior in the way that people should abandon their own language and adopt ours because that is the right thing to do. At least, I don't feel that way personally.
With morals, the same is, IMO, the case.
BTW, if we really are looking for the superior language, it's Esperanto. |
