SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 174.80+0.3%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jazzcat2000 who wrote (60870)1/8/2000 7:33:00 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (2) of 152472
 
re: taxes, Here is a reason why 1% flat rate instead of by-trade commissions is bad (according to my accountant): commissions become part of your basis--they increase your cost of buying and reduce the profit on sale, thus resulting in a smaller net profit or greater net loss for tax reporting purposes. In contrast, a flat rate is just a miscellaneous investment expense (like subscribing to Gilder) which you cannot deduct unless it exceeds 2% of your income. That is the interpretation I was given by my accountant (basically, only commissions and margin interest become part of basis--all else apparently goes into the 2% bin). If that is true, then I don't see why anybody would want a flat-rate structure in a taxable account. Not to mention that 1% could be a lot of money depending on the principle basis. Mucho
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext