Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (60982)	6/8/1999 3:07:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 1573123

<Those are not Tom's results at all, in fact he notes it was done by an Intel supported site and suggests salt might be in order, large grains, one each.> Huh? I thought Tom got the benchmark program from "an Intel-supported site" and ran them on his own machines. That would explain the presence of the overclocked Celerons (500/100 and 450/100, plus the weird 400/100 setting that isn't possible with multiplier-locked Mendocinos) as well as the presence of the AMD processors, since an Intel-supported site wouldn't normally run benchmarks on these processors. That doesn't make the benchmark program itself any more trustworthy, but it does show that Tom is able to duplicate the results on his machines, and it does show that Pentium III's SSE is more than just hype. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next