Larry,
<<< For your sake I hope it has no relevance at all. I see a few parallels ...>>>
What..specifically, are the "few parallels", and what is your basis for concluding that any inferred - on your part - parallels should be "relevent" enough to be published, on this thread, as an assertion? I am, of course, assuming that your last "post" was an assertion...given it's delivery and lack of supporting narrative. Please provide clarification of your assertion...and try to use real data and real information...instead of your opinion. Only YOU seem to be impressed by that.
<<< it's probably pure speculation on my part >>>
...so, what else is new? Your past posts, and the one(s) that will most assuredly (and pitifully) follow, will bare this statement out.........
regards,
bigtoe
|
