SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kansas George who wrote (6149)1/19/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Frank Drumond   of 10072
 
>I can't believe that with any reasonable testing that Sony wouldn't have found this problem?<

These things are usually manufacturing process problems that sound good in engineering but are tough to implement in mass production. Yes, Sony felt pressure to ship as they'd announced. I'm sure that they were able to do pilot production runs and found that yields weren't good but that they could "test" the bad ones out. In the end, they found that the product could not be built in mass as designed.

The inherent problem here is floppy read/write and high capacity read/write. Imation solved this by using contact recording, but the result is a slow drive. Sony was going for the best of both so they need to do contact recording for the floppy and fly the head for the 200 MB capacity. The result is that tolerances are so tight that the head does impact the media when it should be flying. Tough thing to do in a cheap mechanism.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext