Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (6155)	12/6/2003 3:29:30 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) of 15987

Are you saying that the US attack on Iraq provided them with the needed courage to go after their own terrorists? Or is it that the attack was a warning that they need to go after their own terrorists or else the US would do that job for them. Both. The world is not black and white, and neither is the Saudi involvement with militant Islamists.. Some royals, IMO, have formed links with the militants as a means of destabilizing the kingdom and increasing their own influence in the royal family. Remember, only one can be King of Saudi Arabia. And it wouldn't be the first time we saw internal intrigues amongst royal heirs to a throne. Which is why some members of the Saudi royal family have met interesting demises and political reshufflings since 9/11. cooperativeresearch.net eastwestrecord.com There were a few Saudi government officials were were involved in "accidents", but I'm can't seem to find the links at the moment. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next