Tuesday, November 17, 2015 Refugee Policy, or Assisted Suicide?
The political fall-out from the Paris massacre continues.
Here in the USA, we have seen some tentative battle lines drawn as over half of the nation's governors have announced that their states will not accept the so-called refugees from the Middle East. While I welcome this defiance of progressive political correctness, I have no idea whether that is a legally tenable position. Can a state refuse to accept an alien person that the federal government has deemed fit for residence in the USA? We certainly see the progressives arguing that cities and states can refuse to turn over for extradition aliens deemed unfit, but . . . well, you know how it is with progressives. Yes for me, but not for thee, and they do control the federal bureaucracy and much of the court system. So we'll see what happens as the lawyers bash it out.
The state-by-state strategy, of course, has one big flaw. All you need is for one state, e.g., California, to announce that the "refugees" are welcome, and--presto!--they're in. We have no border controls among the states, so somebody arriving in California, will soon have freedom to move about freely throughout the rest of our beleaguered Republic.
This is clearly an issue for the Congress. That raises other issues, the first being how quickly can Congress move to draft effective legislation to ban the "refugees,"overcome a likely veto, and withstand the mau-mauing from the elite progressive media and the "intellectuals"? The other issue is that we have a lawless president who has shown disregard for Congress and the Constitution and is more than willing to get his way by executive fiat. Is impeachment a realistic option? Lovely thought, and if ever a president deserved it it is this one, but I have my doubts.
That said, Congress must act to show that at least one branch of the government still sees America as worth saving.
One more time, let's visit some basic facts. The vast majority of these "Syrian refugees," are neither Syrian nor refugees. We have no realistic way of vetting tens-of-thousands of arrivals--more on that below. We have no vast and accurate data base against which we can compare, names, fingerprints, DNA, stories, etc. We have no idea who these people are, from whence they come, or the intentions they have. Our immigration system is already broken by the crush of years of illegal aliens from elsewhere and the confused and often contradictory policies and legal attitudes we adopt towards them. No way can the immigration lads and lassies handle this new wave. If the "Syrians" come they stay.
As I have said so many times before, vetting is nonsense.
First, as noted above, we have no way of checking the bona fides of these arrivals. Second, more important, as I have said repeatedly, the most serious issue is not whether this or that "refugee" belongs to ISIS, Boko Haram, Jamiat Islamya, Hamas, Al Shabab, and on and on. It is the Islam he brings with him--and most are men. Setting up tens-of-thousands of Muslims in a tolerant, democratic Western country sows the field for a later harvest of radicalization and terror. We have seen it repeatedly as "home grown" terrorists get "radicalized" in their local mosques and become jihadi crazies. Go to Paris, Brussels, Madrid, Dearborn and see what I mean. Islam is not a religion like any other. It is a violent, totalitarian, political-social-economic creed which abhors independent thought, sees women as essentially worthless, murders gays without a thought, and sees us non-believers as worthy only for conversion, enslavement, or death. There is no tolerance, no peace, no love for the other preached or practiced in Islam. It has had no enlightenment and what reformation it has had has pushed it back ever closer to its 7th century origins in the Arabian peninsula. As I have seen throughout my career abroad, a person born in a Muslim culture has the choice of being a good Muslim or being a good person. The two sets do not overlap. Where Islam establishes itself, freedom disappears.
We need a complete and total ban on these Muslim "refugees." We need to treat Islam as we have treated Communism, Fascism, Nazism in the past: as totalitarian threats to our national security. Practitioners of these totalitarian creeds should not be eligible for security clearances, certain jobs, and certainly not for immigration visas.
This week's horror in Paris is just one more example of what happens when the West does not stand up for itself and its precious values and civilization. |
