Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: goldcat who wrote (6209)	2/9/2006 10:53:03 AM
From: dara	of 78417

I think that Resource Investor was having problems with their website this morning but the link should work now. The article is a summary of Frank Lucas' report. I thought this was the most interesting quote: ... Lucas wrote, “If we assume ... a post-trial ‘project value’ of about C$300m. that was awarded 50/50 to AQI and IMA, with AQI having C$1.20 of value in Calcatreu and IMA having 40 cents of other value, then the respective share prices could be AQI C$5.20 and IMA C$6.60. The AQI upside is 225 percent and the IMA upside 83 percent. Downside in the event that the case is lost completely are 25 percent in the case of AQI (maybe more if costs are big) but as much as 90 percent in the case of IMA… Both shares remain a BUY. With Aquiline now being more of a buy than IMA.”

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next