The  City of Light Goes Dark 
  by Denis MacEoin  •  November 20, 2015 at 5:00  am
     The targets in all the Paris attacks were not chosen "randomly." Charlie  Hebdo stood for the Enlightenment value of free speech, for the right to  challenge, even to make fun of figures who deem themselves above criticism:  politicians, religious leaders, the rich and famous. It stood for the right to  be secular: for refusing to fence off religion, or award believers greater  respect than non-believers.
    Like the attempts to shut down all criticism of Islam -- whether in novels  such as Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses, cartoons such as those of  Muhammad drawn and published in Denmark, or debates between academics -- the  Charlie Hebdo killings were intended to instil fear and silence all  honest discussion of Islam and its values.
    Through bold criticism in a secular manner, European states have been able to  create a more pluralistic, tolerant, and humane culture. For devout Muslims (not  just radicals), this is blasphemy of the worst sort: democracy, made by man and  not by Allah, is evil, and tolerance for all beliefs is a path to hell.
    This ongoing failure to admit that the law of jihad is explicitly cited by  spokesmen for Islamic State is the root cause of our inability to fight this  war. The ancestors of today's Europeans knew how to fight against Islamic  encroachment, but today, hundreds of thousands of Muslim migrants, some of them  devoted to waging jihad, are being given free access to enter  Europe.
         Who  does not love Paris? Puritans do not love Paris. Puritans hate, music, song,  dance, poetry, fun and love. Today, such people are represented above all by  extremist Muslim doctrinaire fundamentalists. They seem to despise women without  veils; call music Satanic; regard painted images as an insult to an angry God;  consider football a sin, and a restaurant serving wine as the embodiment of  evil. They do not respond to a life-affirming bustle and the ideals an open,  tolerant, democratic, liberal, humanitarian, egalitarian West.
   When  Sir Karl Popper wrote, at the end of the Second World War in 1945, his  two-volume classic, The Open Society and its Enemies, he laid bare the  evils of totalitarian systems, both left and right -- Communism and Fascism. He  would never have guessed that soon a Third World War would be taking place  between radical Islam and the West.
    Continue  Reading Article   |