SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (62205)6/17/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: Process Boy   of 1575568
 
Petz - <Will the PIII-500 mobile still be on the 0.18µ process?>

I believe so.

<What, in the article at 204.247.196.14, do you consider to be a "leap of logic?">

I was responding to kash with that statement, regarding certain speculations on the thread. No biggie. Article is accurate for what it is reporting.

<I don't think the PII price cuts are related to the 0.18 process problems, after all the PII's are more expensive to make than the PIII's, correct? (so Intel wants to get rid of them)>

I think you are mostly correct. However, Intel wants to promote the PIII as a platform, and this may be a primary reason for the PII cuts. Also, I have reason to believe the .25 600 part was being considered well before the .18 issues were apparent.

PB
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News