SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Koligman who wrote (6251)3/6/2009 9:14:42 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
So even using the 'lower' figure, almost one out of five bankruptcies would have a medical component. Sounds like a problem, doesn't it?

I thought the article called into question the entire analysis. It seems clear that the number of bankruptcies DUE to medical expenses is quite small. These people should be glad they got the care they needed.

I don't think the government can or should protect people from bankruptcy who don't have health insurance.

What is LOST in this discussion is that these people, who ostensibly have no health insurance, had a catastrophic medical problem, yet received thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of medical treatment. They didn't go without health care, even though the rolled the dice and went without insurance.

If it turns out they can't repay their medical debts, bankruptcy is an excellent option for them. It is the price people pay for choosing to go uninsured.

Our government is broke. We can't buy medical insurance for everyone who chooses not to buy their own.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext