International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TrueScouse who wrote (626)	11/29/1996 2:03:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	of 35569

Howard, I don't why some people have such sinister paranoid views about others. I think that I said before that I am interested in making money in stocks. I both trade and do take long term positions. After many years, I have found that I can make more money by not sitting on "dead wood". These threads are very good to find information not in the 10xs, 20f etc.. For some reason people believe that if one trades, that they are crooks or equivalent. Like you said it can provide liquidity. I make many mistakes and trade 5-10 times a day and hold 20+ stocks at any one time. I am genuinely intrigued with the desert ore plays. Someone will unlock that value. You're are correct that I traded the hell out of GPGI, it deserved it. I was "seduced" by the scientific approach (I was a scientist for over 30 years) that IPM was taking, but I am troubled by the difficult mineralization. I keep probing this thread for some advanced information, but get flamed (by other than the thoughtful Ron and Zeev). I would own Naxos if it was trading and I do have a position in CHIP which I am positive about, for now. All stocks have both negative and positive aspects. I have posted what I believed at the time to be true and always post when I have been wrong. I have tried to be objective as I can and have found that the quickest way to the truth (whatever that is) is to challenge the conventional wisdom. It's not pretty, but it gets the truth out quickly. You must admit that the GPGI website is considerably more factual than it was before because of that approach. If people are interested in scamming others by just posting hype, their argument should be challenged. Those that want to just keep their concerns hidden are just asking to take a financial bath IMO. Nobody may agree with me and can just push the next button if they don't want to read my posts. I do that all the time. I do hope that they would argue with fact and not flame. Did I answer your question? If anyone read this far check out PIPE for an easy double, my gift for your patience.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next