A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (6349)	12/3/1998 7:29:00 AM
From: OldAIMGuy	of 18928

Hi SkipperR, As you see, two companies selling to pretty much the same market can behave quite differently! LTD had greater AIM benefit because it cycled in a tight range from '94 to '97. It's harder for AIM to keep up with a stock that's behaved as well as GPS. However, keeping a lid on the Cash Reserve during the long rise kept it from getting out of control. I haven't calculated just how much cash AIM would have raised if run "by the book" but I would imagine it would have been at or above 70% (30% invested) near the peak. The trouble comes with the darned stock doesn't fall enough to get back to being fully invested! Here's the address again for both sets of graphs: execpc.com Best regards, Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next