Evolution Message Board - Msg: 26586765

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (6465)	6/3/2010 12:50:20 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) of 69300

<I think you fail to understand naturalism ....> YOu've gone "tangential" again... I'm not stating anything about naturalism... I'm making a statement about "science"... i.e.: <<Naturalism is a basic given to the scientific establishment today>> As I said, science sayz nothing about God (indeed, we've established that "the establishment" consists of... what what is 40% believers in God? 50%? I forget. You're extraplating all that through YOUR idea of God, and your definition of "naturalism" AND the way you think "naturalism" is used by Science. Further, the premise you are trying to tag on Darwin and evolution via that article (which does it via "naturalism") has TONS of refutations... namely the Catholic Church. So fight it out with the Church...compared to them I donno if your naturalism is wrong or simply your (and the articles) version of God. You'll have to study up... lemme know. DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next