Uh-uh, won't get into a contest with you - I guess my ego isn't as large as yours. Actually, I simply don't have the time to enter a contest on the subject.
Regardless, good luck on your quest of proving yourself and your investment out.
At the same time, you should find another way to vent your frustrations. Offending groups of people who offer contrary opinion isn't helping your personal quest, whatever that might be.
Getting back to Shoal Point. It's going to be a long time before you see any sizable company drilling in this area again. Thus, the success or, the not so successful operation of the "Grey Box" will be open for debate on this play for a long time to come.
Do you think PanCanadian is going to say we screwed up big-time. They really have no reason to. They have said all they want to say on the subject.
Pinnacle would be in better light if they publicly commented that their targeted zone simply was not penetrated by PanCanadian. They have reason for such. In conclusion, the blunt of such material information lies more with Pinnacle, not PanCanadian.
I see no conflict of interest in this type of news or information put out by Pinnacle. It is material information.
Thus, the shoe is now on your foot. When you hold your next discussion with Pinnacle, you might want to ask if they are going public with the info as you deem it to be. And, you can post it here for others to learn more of the details.
Also, will you direct me to the "cut and paste" comments I have featured at this site. You made a comment about that, without doing your homework first. When you get to five of them, let me know how many hours it took you to do that. Frankly, I don't think five of them exist. |
