SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (6183)11/29/2004 1:43:43 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Kofi's Next UN Scam

Friends of Saddam -

The next scam is in the works.

Just how absurd the United Nations has become is highlighted by Libya's recently serving as head of its Human Rights Commission -- and the U.S. seat on the commission was handed over to that garden spot of liberty, Syria.

While nationalism certainly has a dark side, what reason is there to think a world government of some sort would be better? As the "Oil-for-Food Swindle" makes abundantly clear, the politics of the UN is pretty much like politics everywhere: a mix of high hopes (feed the Iraqi people), low motives (award the lucrative contracts for oil to Saddam's French and Russian friends) and a self-interested bureaucracy (cover up the crime).

The fact that the world is divided up into nation states has distinct benefits, not least that they allow for social, political and economic experimentation. As Cornell University political scientist Jeremy Rabkin has pointed out, national sovereignty offers the oppressed at least the possibility of refuge. When things get too bad in one country, people can at least try to flee to some other country.

If the United Nations, by contrast, were sovereign, there would be nowhere else to go
.

Well, you say, nobody thinks the United Nations is going to become a world government anytime soon. But don't be too sure. The proposed international criminal court would give judges appointed by the United Nations the right to judge individual citizens of nation-states (unlike the so-called World Court in the Hague, which arbitrates differences among states). The UN-backed global warming treaty, meanwhile, in effect would put the world's energy supply in the hands of a bunch of bureaucrats.

Annan lost his bet on Kerry, and the time is long past for a serious clipping of the UN's wings -- starting at the top.

Posted by ron

acepilots.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext