<<Tim, my last post on VLNC was to buy on a break above $7 (which I did myself as well),>>
Zeev, I couldn't find your post on the Valence thread to buy on a break above $7. Went back to Nov. 9th.
Here's an excerpt from your last post: <<I.N., I would say that 90% of the time, the professional hedge funds succeed in their short positions. When they have a floorless on their side, it is like shooting fish in barrel.>>
Message 11895482
Here you are (third to last post on Valence thread) calling for $5 stock price for the end of November posted on 11/11: <<I believe that under these circumstances, I think that the stock will slowly drift back to the low $5 toward the end of the month.>> Message 11891811
Here you are saying there wasn't any rush the day before Valence's first PO (fifth to last post on Valence thread): <<The fact that they did a partial conversion indicates to me that the end game "might" be close, but there is a difference between might and "is", and for my own I would rather wait to see the turn around first, I do not think there is any rush.>> Message 11868929
Here you are two days before Valence's first PO saying Valence was under tax loss selling: <<I.N., I think you are not taking into account the time of the year, we are into tax selling season for stock that have underperformed, and VLNC is in this class.>>
Message 11864560
Zeev, I'm just looking for a little accuracy in your Valence claims maybe you can point out that break above $7 call...I'm sure it's there maybe it wasn't your last post?
MJ |
