Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	6/1/2009 9:44:20 PM
	of 224750

“If this isn’t a 5-0 opinion for Franken, I would be totally surprised. You got the sense that the justices were very unpersuaded by the Coleman arguments,” University of Minnesota law professor David Schultz said. “What [the judges] were saying is Coleman didn’t provide the sufficient evidence to either overturn the lower court decision, or sufficient evidence to show why the additional ballots should be introduced.” “You’ve got a state Supreme Court with more Republicans than Democrats. If there’s going to be any kind of hope for Coleman, you’d expect that to come from the Republican-appointed justices,” said election law expert Rick Hasen. “So it’s pretty notable that all three of the Republican appointees were critical of the kinds of arguments that Coleman’s camp made.” Read more: "Court skeptical of Norm Coleman's arguments - Josh Kraushaar - POLITICO.com" - politico.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next