china govt is in favor that current population are fed, housed, and working
that means population policy, socio-economic policy, and industrial policy
you care about the sort of adventures that result in senseless death, over and again, officially sanctioned, babies born, mothers pregnant, and ... just too terrible to even keep reminding you, and yet you seem and in truth are oblivious, because you are of the fraternity that makes a living from such officially sanctioned and industrially profitable exercise, supported by the people for the people, using chemicals and cluster bombs, and by grenades and bare hands. yes? or so the photos indicate.
and it is still the official policy for all to see, with added refinement of special kidnapping, particular rendering, and general weeding.
you seem really shy about this portion of the discussion. why?
you do see the difference do you not? and if not, not so surprising, and i fully understand.
<<If you don't support it, then you don't support your government>>
in freedom hong kong, we simply call it as we see it, based on the correct premise, and that is why we tend to be #1, and when not #1, then #2.
and i do support my government, and i am in favor of the hksar ceo. i cannot think of a single item to fault my government here in hk. you?
your heritage foundation ranks freedom hong kong way above your own locale. why do you think that is?
now, you are supportive of your government and the system of government that quite consistently and persistently produced so much death, destruction, and baby killing?
simple question. |
