SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Carragher who wrote (6722)11/19/2000 8:31:24 AM
From: opalapril   of 10042
 
The point most experts make is that a machine reading error likely will be duplicated when the recount is by the same machine OS and software. If the original count was done by machine, the recount should be done by an alternate means -- especially in the case of notoriously unreliable punch card ballots.

Computer Assisted Vote Tallying An Overview of the Problems, Implications, and Solutions
By Terry Gauchat,
Toronto, Ontario, CANADA
March 25, 1991

"Once again, the ability to recount ballots manually is an important last resort to guarantee that a reliable result can be reported."
the.wiretapped.net

"When votes are tallied via computer or mechanical voting machine it often becomes more difficult to verify that votes are counted properly and that votes are not being systematically changed, added, or eliminated."
research.att.com

New Focus on Flaws in Punch-Card System
nytimes.com

Rebecca Mercuri, the president of the consulting firm Notable Software and an authority on electronic voting tabulation, said: "There's such pressure to get the returns quickly. You can run the punch cards through at a high rate of speed, print out the computerized report, assume it to be correct, and get the results broadcast on the 11 o'clock news."

For that speed, the machines sacrificed accuracy. "With any marginal card, the card reader says, `I'm going to throw that out,' " Ms. Mercuri said. It does not mean that a voter did not vote a certain way, just that the machine cannot be sure, whether because of chad — as the paper punch squares are known — or some other technical issue. "It's a false negative and it needs to be relooked at manually," she said.

* * *

The fact that every run through a punch-card machine results in a different count, as incompletely detached chads fall out, is troubling, but it has seldom affected the outcome of an election. Election administrators were relieved that while counts were always wrong, they were wrong in a consistent way.

"It's almost a certainty that every recount you do that both candidates will pick up votes," said Tony Sirvello, elections administrator for Harris County, Tex., which includes Houston.

* * *

An analysis of the 1996 presidential election by The New York Times found that counties using punch cards reported hundreds of thousands more unvoted ballots — a potential indicator of counting problems — than those using technologies like optical scanning and lever machines.

* * *

The 14 counties in Florida that use punch cards showed especially large rates of ballots with uncounted presidential votes this year — 3.9 percent of the ballots in those counties, compared with 1.5 percent in the counties using optical scanning. Some of that could be attributable to confusing ballot design, some to voter confusion and some to machines' counting irregularities.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext