2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 383.15

+0.8%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Chas. who wrote (67473)	10/26/2010 11:30:02 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation of 218032

That's not totally obvious < Obviously apartheid was a very evil practice > Perhaps some aspects of it were, but not all. For example, now everyone can vote to take opm. Previously, that was not the case. Women now are allowed to vote, even if they contribute no cash flow to government coffers. 100 years ago, women were not allowed to vote. Not long before that, only the landed gentry could vote. In China, only the in-crowd has a say now with voting generally a non-starter. I suspect that under apartheid rule, total per capita happiness was higher than now in South Africa, and under the rules of Salisbury. As TJ says, democracy is over-rated. Voting to take opm by legalized theft is not the highest form of civilization. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next