SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (69183)10/31/2005 12:34:01 AM
From: Dan B.Read Replies (1) of 81568
 
Here's the link to the transcript I used.

freerepublic.com

You have it in another post from me too. You can currently find the video at the bottom of the list on this page (for 9/30/2005), it's naturally virtually word for word, so you can read along as you watch and listen.

c-span.org

Your link there states "Officials did not say specifically why two battalions are no longer rated at Level 1 and thus unable to operate on their own."

You claimed you have a link showing the General explained that they fell out of readiness, in so many words. Your current link contradicts you since it says they did not say why. This isn't really a discrepancy. Your current link employs the use of the word "specifically," so it is technically accurate. However, anyone thinking that officials did not say "generally" why two battalions are no longer rated at level 1 need only see the quotes I provided to know that officials explained that the numbers changed due to refined evaluation methods. Officials further stated that Iraqi forces in fact have gained in experience and strength in numbers throughout. Your quote from your link fails to report the explanation which WAS given, entirely.

Dan B.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext