SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Cadre Resources (CSL.V) Awaiting production #'s and Financ
CSL 322.10-0.5%Dec 8 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: William Puget who wrote (688)7/29/1999 10:08:00 PM
From: Francis R. Biscan Jr.   of 1285
 
Good evening William,

>>Are these your calculations or are they numbers provided by the company? Where did the source for these projections come from?<<

These are my numbers. The sources of information are many, which include some of the original test work and studies that were completed and conversations with one of the geologists that were involved in the beginning. Keep in mind, as I have always said, these are "best estimates". They are only intended to give a general idea of what potential the project holds.

But with that said, I have found nobody, including people far more knowledgeable then me, who can dispute them. The numbers we all want to see, is Tecks.

>>It seems to me that if these are factual numbers that: 1)Teck would be investing heavily in Cadre as would Martin Marietta.<<

Teck is investing as heavily as is prudent. Should they take a position in a company when they have not even completed an evaluation of the project ??

>>2) The public would also be investing heavily in Cadre<<

99% of the public has no idea who Cadre is and it shows.

>>3)Institutions and funds would be investing in Cadre.<<

We will see what happens when the report is complete. I do know there is interest, but there is also guidelines that have to be met....we'll see.

Have a good night,

Rich
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext