SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (694222)1/20/2013 9:42:17 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) of 1575979
 
Finland does not regulate them and they are considered good form to not make excessive noise or damage your hearing.

Sound suppressors, a firearm accessory strictly regulated in many other jurisdictions, are also available in Finland. Their use is not regulated. Their use can be considered to reduce the noise pollution that firearms otherwise produce. Noise pollution is to some extent a problem, since although most ranges are located in relatively remote locations, many ranges may be closed down if the noise becomes a problem for the nearest inhabitants. Suppressors also reduced the risk of hearing damage while shooting. Silencers are not a major topic in Finnish gun control debates as they are almost never used in crimes.

What about a compromise? Suppressors are legal for bolt action rifles in certain calibers.
All calibers are used for hunting and anything supersonic makes harmful noise. Besides a larger can & caliber can be used on any smaller bore and still be rather effective. From personal experience .22lr, .45acp and .300 blackout are all very effectively suppressed. The 9mm and .223 not so much - still pretty loud and wear hearing protection.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext