Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (69522)	9/12/2004 9:02:59 AM
From: Sully-	of 793976

<font color=blue>"Something is obviously really bad about their sources, or they would have been named to start. Smelly, smelly, smelly."<font color=black> That is very telling. If CBS' sources were as solid as they claim, they would have trotted them out there from the very beginning. They didn't. Then the blogs brought the veracity of CBS whole story in question. CBS only brings out a lame handwriting expert who only authenticates the signature on one of four of the documents, a worthless Bush bashing author & one of Killian's contemporaries who was lied to by CBS & has since recanted completely. There's only one logical explanation for all of this. That was their whole line up of "experts". As you say - TWT.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next