Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (69571)	9/12/2004 2:28:43 PM
From: pheilman_	Read Replies (1) of 793927

Will he be foreced to recant? Probably not. Despite the mounting evidence, he has gone with this "definitive evidence" defense. Without the originals, and looking only at multiple copies, it's impossible to say definitively that they are forgeries. Without the originals, it's impossible to prove that they were produced by a laser or inkjet printer rather than a typewriter ribbon. You have not been paying attention. In the handwriting expert's book (Mately?) the statement is: without the originals you cannot confirm legitimacy, but, you can absolutely prove forgery. Barring bizarre behavior by Adobe (the PDF generation step) the kerning absolutely proves these are forgeries. Step back and enjoy the irony, Rather is going to wind up being responsible for getting two Bushes into the White House. The elder by an attack interview which gave a foil to show he was not a "wimp", and now the younger by foiling any further attempt to bring up National Guard issues.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next