DACQ - Shareholder Activists Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DACQ - Shareholder Activists

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Prem Iyer who wrote (2)	11/8/1996 8:13:00 AM
From: Mike Haaren	of 232

Prem & All - I had floated this suggestion to HBL some time ago (no response) but didn't approach Cox directly. My own sense is that, as far as the SAC goes, we would get further by maintaining the initiative ourselves, rather than depending upon Cox to take time to log in here. IMO he has several fish to fry, and DACQ isn't the largest - he has his own outfit to run. Moreover, he appears to own no shares of DACQ, so a threat on our part to dump ours probably wouldn't carry much weight. It seems to me that the primary benefit of a SAC would be to channel info to and from the company quickly and effectively, and to guide shareholder concerns into one unit that would deal more intimately with Cox and any other parties, and permit the reverse as well. The key to getting things done is to get closer to these people, meet them when we can face-to-face, and to show in an organized and professional manner that we all share the same goal - seeing this company grow strong and consistently profitable. For our own parts, we also have to ensure that management refrains from taking action to the detriment of the smaller shareholders. Mike.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next