Geology, mining and assorted terminology thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Geology, mining and assorted terminology thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Matthew J. Levesque who wrote (68)	12/20/1996 8:41:00 PM
From: M.E.	of 110

Exactly. A well can produce a significant amount of hydrocarbons initially, however, can it maintain the constant flow rate? 73 million cubic feet is ok, in my opinion (better than a dry hole). It shows that there is something there. However, 73,000 mcfd is much better. Now if it is an exploration well (wildcat or whatever) then it could help in providing more information regarding the reservoir. I guess what it comes down to is more exploration work... Don't forget to consider the production of water with the hydrocarbons too when looking at "well impressiveness". Do you have any thoughts on Ebony Oil and Gas? They have alot of information about iodine surveys, which look impressive, but at the same time risky... Ho, ho, ho :-) Mich

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next