SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: tbancroft8/10/2009 4:04:40 PM
2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 224751
 
CBO: Obama's Big Plan To Save Money By Increasing Preventative Care And Testing Will Actually Cost More Money

Dear Mr. Flag@whitehouse.gov.....You may want to have a chat with the gang over at CBO and the New England Journal of Medicine.

     In yet more disappointing news for Democrats pushing for 
health care reform, Douglas W. Elmendorf, director of the
Congressional Budget Office, offered a skeptical view Friday
of the cost savings that could result from preventive care --
an area that President Obama and congressional Democrats
repeatedly had emphasized as a way health care reform would be
less expensive in the long term.

Obviously successful preventive care can make Americans
healthier and save lives. But, Elmendorf wrote, it may not
save money as Democrats had been arguing.

"Although different types of preventive care have
different effects on spending, the evidence suggests that for
most preventive services, expanded utilization leads to
higher, not lower, medical spending overall," Elmendorf wrote.
"That result may seem counterintuitive.

As the story goes on to point out (there's lots of good stuff there), only a fraction of people will contract a given disease. By testing a lot more people who were never going to get it, you are creating a lot more costs and you will still have to cost of treating those who were going to get it anyway.

Also, and I'm guessing a bit here, if you find certain things early you will run up a lot more cost in treatment, you will just start earlier but the result will often be the same (everyone is going to die at some point).

Yes, some people will be saved or lead improved lives because of early detection and that's a good thing. That's just not a cost savings argument which is the case Obama and the Democrats are making for all this new testing they want to do.

Eventually the money to pay for all of this will have to come from somewhere or costs will have to be cut. And we're right back where we started from except...the government is in charge of that decision, not individuals.

It's almost as if, despite what Obama and the left want people to think, there are no free lunches. This is especially true with something as expensive and personally valuable as heath care.

Gabe had this in the headlines but I think it's worth noting. We're getting caught up and rightly so, in the fight, it's important to remember the reason we are fighting is that Obama's plan is crap. Very dangerous crap at that.

link
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext