SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (6474)1/8/2005 3:28:58 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Five Embeds Kicked Out Of Iraq

Captain Ed

Editor and Publisher reports today that five embedded reporters working with Coalition forces in Iraq have been booted from their privileged positions for transmitting information that endangered the security of the troops:


<<<
As Iraq moves closer to its first democratic elections later this month, the number of news organizations requesting embedded slots with military units there is on the rise, according to officials. But those new embeds better watch their step. E&P has learned that five journalists have been kicked out of embed slots in the past three months for reporting secure information.

"They were all for operational security reasons, (revealing) something that would have been of use to the enemy," Maj. Kris Meyle, who runs the embed program, told E&P from Baghdad this morning. "Generally, it gets done very quickly. Usually it was something that was not done intentionally by the reporter."
>>>

Meyle did not disclose the identities of the embeds sent home, but did note that they all represented broadcast media and not newspapers. Reporters embedded with troops get clear instructions not to disclose information that could be used by enemies to target the troops on the ground; failure to comply gets a reporter kicked out, as has happened here. During the invasion, reporters didn't seem to have a problem complying with the standards, but that's probably due to the moment-to-moment action of the battles they covered. Now they have more time to develop stories and more pressure to deliver sensational reports, which leads to errors in judgment.

E&P also reports that more requests for embeds have come in as the Iraqi elections draw closer, an interesting and somewhat contradictory development. The media has trumpeted the lack of security that threatens to derail the elections -- and yet more reporters want to be at the polling places to report the story. I'm not questioning the courage of the reporters, but does it occur to them that the Iraqis themselves might have more at stake in this election and will have the motivation to risk a visit to these same polling stations?

Posted by Captain Ed

captainsquartersblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext