Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 101.61

+2.8%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SBHX who wrote (72619)	5/11/2001 9:22:18 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) of 93625

Re: If the contracts were entered into where one party actually knew... The legal term is "fraud in the inducement" which means that one of the signers of the contract was induced to sign because of a mis-representation by the other party. If "fraud in the inducement" can be shown, the contract is not binding. The nice thing about "fraud in the inducement" is that, if it can be claimed, all terms of the contract are void. Including all the "fine print" which often has gotchas like penalties or requirements that one of the parties pay the legal fees of the other party in the event of a dispute. All terms of the contract are out if "fraud in the inducement" can be shown. And that Jury conviction for fraud on the part of Rambus should do the trick for Samsung, etc. (I'll check those words carefully before posting them) :-) Dan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next