Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (726244)	7/13/2013 5:21:28 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	of 1576894

Start with his denial that he never heard of the SYG law...... Then his claim that the kid bashed his head 20 times or more to produce two scratches... His claim the he was punched 20 or more times but there are marks on only one hand of the kid from one hit.... His claim that the kid grabbed his gun but left no DNA or prints on it.... His claim that the kid was covering his mouth and nose but had no blood on his hands or anywhere else except a sleeve of his hoodie.. His claim that it was God's will.... Never saying how he tried to defend himself if he did..... His claim that the kid straddled him with his knees at his arm pits...... and Zim never tried to roll over.... Why was Zim's flashlight found about 30 feet away from the shooting toward the direction the kid was running.How did he lose it? It's not the defense's job to prove any of that. It's the prosecution's job to provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt about what happened. Oh, so, what if Trayvon's hands were inside the sleeve of his hoodie. Would there be blood on his hands? Or would there be blood on the sleeve of his hoodie? And he said he reached for the gun, not that he grabbed it. Reaching doesn't pass DNA. Maybe most of the head bashes happened in the grass where dep lacerations wouldn't be caused but it would certainly ring his bell. He claimed that the kid was at his armpits...which was likely the case at one point. But witness Good said that he saw him straddling further down the body. Could it be that after having his bell rung by a punch to the nose and head banged against the ground that he doesn't remember every twitch of every muscle and every position of his attacker. It's pretty hard to dispute that Martin was on top of Zimmerman. There were witnesses that saw it. So, in Hillary's words, does it really matter if he was right up to the armpits of Zimmerman or if he was a little bit further down the body?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next