Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 177.45

-0.5%

12:11 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mindykoeppel who wrote (72940)	1/2/2008 9:24:13 AM
From: mindykoeppel	Read Replies (1) of 196964

Verizon is a special case because of their license agreement with BRCM. Judge will comment further on Verizon. Q had no idea who the second carrier was who was supposed to have signed an agreement with BRCM and whether that agreement was only for the ITC infringement or included the Santa Ana infringement. Qualcomm was going do everything it can as expeditiously as possible to seek a stay, appeal this judge's injunction et. Qualcomm was also going to appeal the jury decision from May 2007 on the validity of those three patents and the infringement itself in the jury's original finding.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next