SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: frankw1900 who wrote (731361)11/7/2020 10:57:23 PM
From: skinowski12 Recommendations

Recommended By
Ben Smith
Bill
burlegoat
isopatch
lightshipsailor

and 7 more members

   of 793843
 
That’s why, when - for months - NY was showing test positivity rate of under 1%, I was saying that a large majority of their “positives” were false positives.

You can assume that many among the people taking the test have symptoms. They have something that worries them. So, the prevalence of positivity among them, if anything, is likely to be higher that the prevalence of the disease in the general population. This means that with a positivity rate of, let’s say, 0.7%, they hardly have any real infections. Most of their “positive” tests are false.

Using 40-45 replications (cycles) when NO live virus can be shown after 35 replications is a disaster. They close schools and have people lock themselves at home for weeks over infections that are... fictions. That don’t exist. And they call it following the science!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News