SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TimF10/5/2009 5:53:32 PM
   of 224729
 
The Obama Administration And The Tobacco Cartel

Why did Altria, formerly known as Phillip Morris, RJ Reynolds, Liggett Myers, and Lorillard go along with the administration’s plan, enacted by Congress, to allow FDA regulation of cigarettes and other tobacco products? Why didn’t they try to mobilize the Republican Party, which if anemic is still strong enough to put brakes on various stimulus bills as well as government-run health insurance? Because it set the tobacco companies up forever. Because FDA regulation of tobacco establishes a cartel, an oligopoly in which new competitors cannot break into the nicotine market, because new competitors will never be able to afford the hideous costs and hurdles that drug manufacturers go through whenever they want to introduce a new product.

Even if what they want to sell is a competing product which is indisputably safer than cigarettes.

FDA spokeswoman Siobhan DeLancey tells a St. Louis paper, “We don’t know if this is any better for them.” If the FDA really doesn’t know whether inhaling water vapor containing nicotine is less dangerous than inhaling smoke containing myriad toxins and carcinogens, it cannot be trusted to make scientific judgments about the safety of anything it regulates. But since the FDA has approved various nicotine replacement products (including inhalers!) as safe and effective smoking cessation aids, we have to assume/hope DeLancey is lying, just as FDA spokeswoman Rita Chappelle presumably was lying when she told NPR “some people may mistakenly perceive [e-cigarettes] to be safer alternatives to conventional tobacco use,” thereby asserting that they are not, in fact, safer, even though they do not contain tobacco and do not generate combustion products.

Let’s roll that back: Some people, who cannot overcome their nicotine addiction, may mistakenly believe that e-cigarettes, which deliver nicotine-infused water vapor into the nicotine-addict’s lungs, are safer than cigarettes, which deliver carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, ammonia, toluene, and cyanide into the addict’s lungs. Where is the mistake? Does Rita Chapelle believe that, in order to make e-cigarettes as safe as conventional cancer sticks, e-cigarette manufacturers should add cyanide to their products?...

popehat.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext