SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company
QCOM 181.30-0.5%Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: quartersawyer who wrote (7319)3/8/2000 6:00:00 PM
From: Randall Knight   of 13582
 
And I'd love to see the cdma2000 consortium try to come up with 3G handsets against the competition from Nokia and Ericsson. The third generation handsets will have to offer GSM compatibility - they will have to operate in both old GSM netwroks and new 3G networks.

That is something that Nokia will not do without QCOM ASICs. 3G means CDMA. Nokia can't build a handset capable of taking advantage of 3G. They can barely build a handset that works in IS95A. W-CDMA (Spread Spectrum CDMA) is NOT an upgrade to GSM. It is a brand new overlay. Just because a handset is GSM compatible, doesn't mean squat for its ability to function on a 3G network.

This is why Tero should be ignored. He has a basic lack of understanding of the upgrade path for GSM. He writes well though.

BTW, a CDMA2000 implementation in Europe for 3G would cost no more than the so called W-CDMA. Each one would require the same amount of new infrastructure. The big difference is that CDMA2000 actually works.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext