SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kirk © who wrote (703)6/27/2004 4:05:35 PM
From: American Spirit   of 2772
 
Why was Bush in a rush to invade Iraq? We had Iraq surrounded, in a box, with UN inspectors getting unprecdented access. Also we had not taken the time to build a real coalition or get UN support for an invasion. Finally, the Bush administration never worked out a post-invasion plan. Or if they did it was not a realistic one. What was the big rush?

Everyone agreed Saddam was a menace, but he was not an imminent threat the way Bush told us, and he was not in league withy Al Qaida or involved in 9-11. Quoting democrats as saying Saddam had WMD's or was dangerous missses the point. You don't just start a war based on a belief someone might have weapons, especially when uyou already have them surrounded and are inspecting them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News