SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7295)2/18/2005 12:18:39 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
On 2/7/05, UCSY filed a Supplemental Citation of Authority that, on 2/10, was stricken by the judge. So what does UCSY do for an encore? They file a Renewed Supplemental Citation of Authority!

The problem is that UCSY has been stymied by Lycos claiming a statutory immunity defense based on 47 USC 230 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. To get around this, UCSY is claiming a) they are being cyber stalked, and b) subject to unauthorized use of the "UCSY" trade name. ROFL! 


2/7/05   82     SUPPLEMENTAL CITATION OF AUTHORITY by Universal Communicat,
                 Michael J. Zwebner in support of [69-1] response reply to
                 defendants' opposition to plaintffs' motion to amend
                 complaint (bb) [Entry date 02/08/05]

2/9/05   83     NOTICE of violation of Court Order and MOTION by Lycos,
                 Inc., Terra Lyco, Inc. to consolidate case
                 05-20149-CIV-MORENO with eariler action, and for
                 sanctions (bb) [Entry date 02/10/05]

2/10/05  84     ORDER striking [82-1] notice of dispositive case authority
                 (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 02/10/05) [EOD Date:
                 2/11/05] (bb) [Entry date 02/11/05]

2/15/05  85     RENEWED SUPPLEMENTAL CITATION OF AUTHORITY by Universal
                 Communicat, Michael J. Zwebner in support of [69-1]
                 response reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiffs'
                 motion to amend complaint (bb) [Entry date 02/16/05]


- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News