SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: aladin who wrote (73633)2/13/2003 7:10:32 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Actually the voodoo logic is JohnM's. He suffers from not being an engineer (apologies John :-).

Hi, John. Geez, you do know how to punish a busy guy. I'm well into other projects right now and you would force me to go find all those statements from multiple prize winners to the effect that money spent on anti-defense missiles is a waste of money without a great deal more testing. I think I'll take a pass, at least for the moment.

The Cold War is over. We need new systems for new threats.

Boy, do I ever agree with that line. But how about spending enough money to equip firefighters with the proper gas masks. Hasn't been done. Will be many years before it is done. Apparently. See this from CBS News.

First things first.

Gas Mask Failure Stuns Firefighters

cbsnews.com

The firefighters facing new and urgent warnings of a possible terror attack are well versed in the life and death skill of applying their gas masks, which they have 60 seconds to do.

Which is why, as CBS News Correspondent Wyatt Andrews reports, it has stunned some rescue teams to learn that almost none of the masks used today can seal out poison gas.

In a government test developed after Sept. 11, either mustard or sarin gas penetrated every major mask, except one used in only a handful of cities.

In the age of "orange" terrorism alerts, the failure of the masks is shocking news.

When he received the report, the chief of the Arlington Virginia Fire Department, Ed Plaugher, says he was, "devastated - literally devastated."

Plaugher led the Sept. 11 response at the Pentagon. Even though his rescue teams presumed there might be poison gas, they rushed in anyway, certain their gear would protect them. That confidence is gone.

"The failure of the test is a very, very big deal for us, because it means we have to re-evaluate and re-ramp the way that we attack an incident like this," says Plaugher.

What he means is delay. Today, if the alarm rings and a gas attack is suspected, the Arlington teams will not rush in.

"This is going to cost lives," he says. "This is going to delay rescues, absolutely."

Fire departments all over America, especially in places where terrorists might attack, face a tough choice. They can subject their rescue teams to a higher level of risk, which is dangerous, or replace or retrofit their masks, which is expensive.

According to Harold Shaitburger, the chief of the International Association of Firefighters, it would cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

Shaitburger says the federal government must step in because local governments can't afford new equipment.

"This goes to the heart of what is homeland security all about," he says. "It's a national responsibility, it is a federal effort."

It could be years before masks that can handle poison gas reach the teams that need them. But today rescue teams on high alert for the next attack could face the unheard of order to hold back.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext