SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Philosopher who wrote (74285)9/10/2003 4:14:16 PM
From: TimF   of 82486
 
"Town without Pity"

.

.

spoiler warning

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

So I assume, though you didn't explicitly say so, that the soldiers don't get the death penalty because she didn't stay until the end of the trial. Right?

I think the defense saw two advantages from trying to malign the character of the victim. 1 - She wouldn't stay so that it would be impossible for the trial to result in a death penalty and 2 - Whether she stays or not if the jury thinks the girl was a little tramp they might be more lenient in sentencing. In the end the 4 soldiers got 25, 20, 16 and 6 years, plus a dishonorable discharge. The one who got 6 years may not have actually participated in the rape (old movies aren't as graphic and the actual rape is not shown) but he would at least have been an accessory (he was there and was with the rapist whether or not he committed rape, he didn't try to stop it, he didn't report the crime).

How did you feel about what the lawyer did? Fair? Unfair? Necessary? Appropriate?

Unfair to be sure, but maybe necessary to do his duty to his client. Still I couldn't say I totally approve, he did act like an ass, and it might reasonably be argued that the judge should have reigned in the attack on the victim.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext