SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: chartseer who wrote (75153)11/13/2009 5:01:03 AM
From: Hope Praytochange   of 224750
 
> The Coming Climate Dictatorship
> Posted 07:43 PM ET
>
>
> Control: The House and Senate climate bills contain a provision giving the
> president extraordinary powers in the event of a "climate emergency." As
> chief of staff Rahm Emanuel says, a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
>
> If you thought the House health care bill that nobody read has hidden
> passages that threaten our freedoms and liberty, take a peak at the
> "trigger" placed in the byzantine innards of both the House-passed
> Waxman-Markey bill and the Kerry-Boxer bill just passed by Democrats out
> of Sen. Barbara Boxer's Environment and Public Works Committee.
>
> As Nick Loris of the Heritage Foundation points out, the Kerry-Boxer bill
> requires the declaration of a "climate emergency" if the concentration of
> carbon dioxide and other declared greenhouse gases in the atmosphere
> exceeds 450 parts per million (ppm). It was at about 286 ppm before the
> Industrial Revolution and now sits at around 368 ppm.
>
> That figure was picked out of a hat because the warm-mongers believe
> that's the level at which the polar ice caps will disappear, boats can be
> moored on the Statue of Liberty's torch and dead polar bears will wash up
> on the beaches of Malibu.
>
> The Senate version includes a section that gives the president authority,
> under this declared "climate emergency," to "direct all Federal agencies
> to use existing statutory authority to take appropriate actions ... to
> address shortfalls" in achieving greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions.
>
> What the "appropriate actions" might be are not defined and presumably
> left up to the discretion of the White House. Could the burning of coal be
> suspended or recreational driving be banned? Sen. David Vitter, R-La.,
> asked the EPA for a definition and received no response.
>
> Competitive Enterprise Institute scholar Chris Horner says "this agenda
> transparently is not about GHG concentrations, or the climate. It's about
> what the provision would bring: almost limitless power over private
> economic activity and individual liberty for the activist president and,
> for the reluctant leader, litigious greens and courts" packed by liberal
> Democrat appointees.
>
> Writing in the Financial Times recently, Czech President Vaclav Klaus,
> author of the book, "Blue Planet, Green Shackles," said: "As someone who
> lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I
> see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
> prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not communism."
>
> Klaus, who has challenged Al Gore to a debate and has rejected Europe's
> embrace of Kyoto, told the Cato Institute recently that "environmentalism
> is a religion" that accepts global warming on faith and seeks to exploit
> it to reshape the world and economic order.
>
> "Environmentalism only pretends to deal with environmental protection," he
> told the libertarian think tank. "Behind the terminology is really an
> ambitious attempt to radically reorganize the world."
>
> The Minnesota Free Market Institute recently hosted an event at Bethel
> University in St. Paul, Minn. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton,
> former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, warned
> of one of the consequences of Copenhagen - the loss of American
> sovereignty.
>
> "I read that treaty," Lord Monckton said, "and what it says is this: that
> a world government is going to be created. The word 'government' actually
> appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second
> purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to Third
> World countries, (to satisfy) what is called, coyly, 'climate debt' -
> because we've been burning CO2 and they haven't."
>
> This nation was founded and built by those yearning to breathe free. Its
> freedoms are imperiled by those demanding that we breathe pure. We are
> human sacrifices to the earth goddess Gaia. Loss of sovereignty to both a
> federal and a world government and redistribution of wealth on a global
> scale - all this in the name of saving the planet from a concocted threat.
>
> As we have said, the road to Copenhagen is being paved with good
> intentions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext