SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Canario who wrote (7531)9/24/1996 4:52:00 PM
From: Trakker   of 58324
 
Michael, Take a look at post #7096. Potential is there, now to reach that potential a company needs to have aggressive marketing and R&D. I laugh when I see these dire predictions that the stock will tank because its cap has hit $2b+. Obviously these are people trying to manipulate the thinking of the neophyte, or they're people who haven't done their homework. Look across the tech industry and I'm sure you will find a large number of companies trading at 6-8-10x.

Good luck, I hope you haven't missed the ride up. I remember a lot of people also saying they would buy back in at single digits (7ish), then 11ish, then 13ish, now it's up to $17. Who knows, we could have OEM announcements at FallCOMDEX on '97 PC lines that could clinch the standards deal, CPQ could finally give in and add Zips to desktops and/or laptops, Jaz could become the standard solution for Motorola's new MAC OS system (BTW: IOMG and MOT did a joint ad together last Spring talking about the MOT parts that supplied to IOMG). All these scenarios could lead to a nice spike, or they couldn't -- but one things for sure, all of these scenarios are probable and if you are on the train now at a $2 premium ($17 vs. $19) you probably won't be kicking yourself when the price is $35+ come February.

Again, good luck
trakker

P.S. Archie, it's good to hear from you. Hope your IOMG class project is going as expected.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext