France: No Convictions Without Confessions
Captain Ed
captainsquartersblog.com
The French have responded to the CIA's release of the long list of officials bribed by Saddam Hussein through the UN Oil-For-Food program -- and it's a non-denial denial:
France dismissed accusations made in an official US report that French businessmen and politicians received bribes from Saddam Hussein order to influence government policy on Iraq, with the foreign ministry describing them as "unverified." ...
"It is important that we check very closely the truth behind these claims, because as far as we understand it the accusations ... are unverified either with the persons concerned or the authorities of the countries concerned," ministry spokesman Herve Ladsous said.
In other words, France will not accept the results of the report if it is not accompanied by either (a) an individual admission of guilt, and/or (b) an admission of guilt by the country -- France! That's a nice example of circular logic. By that reasoning, we should never convict anyone without their confession first. It explains why the French felt it necessary to hide the murderer Ira Einhorn for so long. "Zut alors," they exclaimed, "he says he did not verify the charges!"
Notice, however, that the French never claimed that the charges were erroneous or incorrect -- merely that they were not verified by the people who profited from the graft. More on the non-response response from our allies, the French:
The French Socialist party meanwhile refused to respond to the accusation made in the report that it was given one million dollars by Iraq in 1988. A spokesman said the party could not react to allegations of which it was only partially informed. ...
"Maybe there are some people who could have been corrupted -- it is possible -- but the French position was not based on such arguments. France thought that what the US said about WMD was wrong and that we had to respect international procedures at the UN," said deputy Daniel Garrigue, president of the National Assembly's Iraq study group.
Garrigue wants to assure that despite taking money on the sly from a dictator in order to undermine the sanctions regime France claimed kept Saddam in his box, it was only their scruples that were corrupt and not their judgement. Anyone who buys that argument must either be French or a Democrat.
Posted by Captain Ed at 12:48 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Florida Pulls Into Bush Column
Two polls released in the last 24 hours show Florida swinging solidly behind George Bush, dashing hopes among John Kerry supporters of creating yet another race-based smear of Republicans in the Sunshine State. The Mason-Dixon poll conducted Oct 4-5, after the first Bush-Kerry debate, shows Bush up, 48-44. However, when you look at the polling sample, you see some interesting data:
Men 307 (49%)...Whites 491 (79%)...Democrats 279 (45%) Women 318 (51%)...Blacks 65 (10%)...Republicans 258 (41%) ..................Hispanic 65 (10%)..Independents 88 (14%)
Forgive any formatting issues (it's hard to emulate tables), but you can see that the M-D poll give a four-point sampling edge to Democrats. On the other hand, it looks like both blacks and Hispanics may be underrepresented, and with its large Cuban community, the Hispanic vote has traditionally supported the GOP.
Quinnipiac also reported results for Florida today, showing Bush up by 7 in the Sunshine State:
President George W. Bush leads Democratic challenger John Kerry 51 - 44 percent among Florida likely voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Independent candidate Ralph Nader received less than 1 percent in this tally, which includes undecided voters leaning toward a candidate.
Among registered voters, President Bush gets 46 percent to Sen. Kerry's 42 percent, with 1 percent for Nader, compared to a 49 - 41 percent Bush lead among registered voters in a September 23 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN uh-pe-ack) University.
Among Bush supporters, 78 percent say they are voting mainly for the President. Kerry supporters split with 48 percent voting mainly for the Democrat and 47 percent voting mainly against Bush.
"President Bush enjoys a 7-point lead among likely voters in Florida because he is viewed as a strong leader and more capable of handling terrorism and the war in Iraq. Sen. Kerry has gained some ground on Bush in the areas of leadership and his vision of what he would do as President," said Clay F. Richards, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
No one doubts that Florida represented the Holy Grail for Democrats in this election. It has become their mythology that the previous election was stolen from them there, despite a number of independent recounts which clearly show Bush won, including one conducted by the national media. They hoped to win Florida not only for its big chunk of electoral votes but also to drive home that stolen-election myth.
Instead, the Democrats nominated a candidate who even after the debate can't generate more enthusiasm for his candidacy among his supporters than against George Bush. Not only does that explain Bush's seven-point lead, but it also portends a smaller turnout on Election Day that may widen the moderate gap into a rout.
Nor is that the only gap. Despite a narrow plurality of voters saying they believe the war in Iraq was a mistake, Bush holds a twelve-point lead over Kerry in fighting terrorism and a ten-point gap in leadership. Kerry's favorability numbers improved to 36%, and still trails Bush's by eight points.
The Democrats may need to go myth-shopping after November... |
