Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Nadine Carroll	10/10/2004 5:38:30 PM
	of 793800

from instapundit the New York Times, having earlier decided that War Plays a Role in Elections in Australia, now believes that Iraq remained in the background* during the campaign.* instapundit.com It's a definitional thing, you see. If Howard had lost with a good economy, that would have proved that the war was the important issue. But since he won, it proved that only the economy was the important issue. The thought that the majority of Australians might actually approve Howard's conduct of the war apparently did not cross the reporter's mind as a possibility, it seems. In other words, heads I win, tails you lose. Bias? Nah, no bias, nothing to see here, move along, move along.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next