SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (76660)6/1/2006 12:09:50 AM
From: CogitoRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
>>What he notes is that the Times is not citing Kerry's medical records for evidence.

...

Now either the Times has the record or it doesn't. Logic would tell you that if it had the record, and the record supported Kerry, the record would have been cited. So either it doesn't support Kerry, or they don't have the record. If they don't have the record, it means Kerry hasn't released it. Why not, if it would support him or at least not contradict him?

What's the simplest explanation here?<<

Nadine -

What he said was that the Times must have Kerry's medical records, and therefore the fact that they didn't cite them proves that the records show Kerry lied.

Now ask yourself this question. If the Navy's own medical records did not support the idea that Kerry was wounded in battle and had therefore earned a Purple Heart, why would the Navy have awarded him a Purple Heart? Three of them, actually. Do you suppose the Navy didn't have access to its own records?

There might be any number of explanations of why Kerry hasn't released the records. Maybe there's something embarrassing or highly personal in there that he just doesn't want everyone to know. Maybe he caught a dose of the clap in Saigon. Whatever.

- Allen
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext