SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options 201: Beyond Obi-Wan-Kenobe

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: OX who wrote (765)2/23/2003 7:39:34 PM
From: Dominick   of 1064
 
That was my thought. Using standard HV or IV method it was 60% or more.

But using BB indicators on a chart, the upper band was around 10% higher than the 50 day mean using 2 SD. Multiplying by 2.245 gave him 22%.

I'm using symbol AEM not AEG.TO, so my prices are in the teens.
But looking at long term chart with BBs 95% of time the prices stay with in the bands. So why couldn't one use those measurements for volatility instead of the standard method?

After the BBs narrow, they go wide, and after they go wide, they go narrow. Kind of simple when you think about it.
Since he's not sure of the direction, he sells a straddle for a credit that has break-evens at the outer bands.

Like he says, "it works". Can't argue with that!

Dominick
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext