SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (770789)2/23/2014 2:45:36 AM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB

  Read Replies (1) of 1576894
 
>> f it's a "liberal lie", it's one from the conservative Wall Street Journal!

Unlike most news sources, WSJ presents both sides of arguments, this one included.

The liberal lie is in the suggestion that there is some equivalence between "heavy truck traffic" (which is at issue in the suit) and the kinds of environmental problems fracking has been blamed for, but which haven't been shown to occur.

I'm in a state where their is a lot of fracking activity, some of which is on land owned by me. I've seen no instance where the "damage" by trucks wasn't more than offset by the benefits. And here, at least, residents LOVE it when the drilling begins. Because we understand that it means money, jobs, and economic benefit. In some of these tiny communities when a company comes in and spends $12 million drilling & fracking a well, no one is about to complain about it as long as there isn't damage to the water table, which there never is.

Here at least, most interested parties understand what it is and what it isn't. While there have been reports of minor earth quakes -- quakes of insignificant magnitude -- in some remote areas, I don't see anyone really complaining about it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext