SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 488.71-0.7%1:21 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: C. Niebucc who wrote (7717)5/20/1998 5:33:00 PM
From: Logos   of 74651
 
Re: <Justice first attacked Microsoft over its practice of charging computer makers a license fee for every machine shipped, rather than just those actually shipped with Windows. But the only competitor for Windows was a copy of Windows loaded illegally. In protecting itself Microsoft was protecting its honest customers from free-riders.>

But I'm pretty sure Microsoft forced the box makers to pay for MS DOS, whether they used it or another DOS, such as DR DOS. Here was a case where there really was a competitor to the Microsoft product (and a lot of people thought DR DOS was better than MS DOS). Granted, DR DOS was doomed from the day Windows 3.0 first shipped, but that doesn't justify what Microsoft did. Does anybody know more on this?

Haz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext