Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (7760)	9/12/2003 4:37:45 PM
From: MSI	of 793914

Err... who are we to "encourage" any foreign country to make any sorts of changes to their farming? So we shouldn't encourage 3rd world farmers to sell us food because it would lead to them ruining their wilderness What the author is saying is: The benefits of WTO and agribusiness generally accrue to agribusiness, not the local population. They employ fewer and fewer people. Yes, increased productivity may lead to less land per output, but that output won't lead to less use of land -- because agribusiness's role is to maximize global output and corporate profit, not be of any help to the locals. Any hype to the contrary is disingenuous. The truth is better told by seeing results in Latin America and elsewhere. No one seems to want the local sovereign countries make that determination, which is the bottom line, IMO. Instead, we seeing various arguments about type of corporate incursion they will be forced to take. And, of course, its always "for their own good". It appears the fond wish is to put the rest of the world in the category of Japan and Germany, as defeated opponents to be taken over and restructured by an assigned Viceroy.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next